The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management publishes original articles on topics relevant to studying, implementing, measuring and managing knowledge management and intellectual capital.

For general enquiries email administrator@ejkm.com
Click here to see other Scholarly Electronic Journals published by API
For a range of research text books on this and complimentary topics visit the Academic Bookshop

Information about the European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM) is available here.

For info on the International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning (ICICKM), click here
Information about the European Conference on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital (ECIIC) is available here
 
Journal Issue
Volume 14 Issue 4, Intellectual Capital at a Crossroad / Dec 2016  pp191‑255

Editor: Maurizio Massaro, Andrea Garlatti

Download PDF (free)

Editorial  pp191‑192

Maurizio Massaro, Andrea Garlatti

Look inside Download PDF (free)

The Determinants of Knowledge‑based Economy Development at a National Level: A Conceptual Model driven from KBE Theoretical Paradox and Advanced Practices  pp193‑206

Sara A. Al-Maadeed, Vishanth Weerakkody

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Emotional Intelligence Competencies as Antecedents of Innovation  pp207‑219

Mariza Tsakalerou

Look inside Download PDF (free)

The links between the Intellectual Capital Efficiency Ratio (ICER) and the performance of Polish listed companies from the food industry sector  pp220‑230

Grzegorz Urbanek

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Intellectual Capital Based Evaluation Framework for Dynamic Distributed Software Development  pp231‑244

Pekka Kamaja et al

Look inside Download PDF (free)

The use of Intellectual Capital reports: The case of Italy  pp245‑255

Maria Serena Chiucchi, Marco Giuliani, Stefano Marasca

Look inside Download PDF (free)

Abstract

Abstract: In the last two decades, scholars, practitioners and governments have underlined the relevance of reporting intellectual capital (IC). Analysing the evolution of IC research (Guthrie et al., 2012, Petty and Guthrie, 2000) and considering the fact that some ‘IC pioneer’ companies, like Skandia, have abandoned IC reporting, a recent stream has pointed out the need to investigate the use of IC reports ‘in practice’ (Dumay, 2013, Guthrie et al., 2012, Mouritsen, 2006) in order to understand whether IC reporting is something relevant or just a managerial “fashion” (Dumay, 2012, Mouritsen and Roslender, 2009, Fincham and Roslender, 2003). Moving from these considerations, the aim of our study is to explore if, how, and why IC reports are used by companies and if, how, and why IC measurement and reporting practices do (or do not) stabilise. In order to achieve this aim, a field study approach was adopted (Lillis and Mundy, 2005, Roslender and Hart, 2003). More specifically, the paper highlights the fact that the IC report is frequently a ‘personal business’ and discusses the determining role of some ‘key’ actors (i.e. project sponsors and project leaders) in affecting if, how, and what kind of evolution IC reports and measurements may undergo. Further, the paper sheds light on how the IC ‘lock‑in’ phenomenon may occur not only in the accounting domain but also in others. Finally, it contributes to confirming the fragility of IC indicators. Differently from the majority of extant studies, this one focuses not only on the production of IC measurements and reports or on their peculiarities, but also on their use. Moreover, it adopts a longitudinal perspective as opposed to focusing on a specific moment in time. Lastly, in order to gain a broader view of IC in practice, this paper offers insights collected from several organizations, rather than from a single case study. 

 

Keywords: Intellectual Capital reports, use of IC measurements, benefits and drawbacks of IC reports, field study, Italy

 

Share |